Copyright & intellectual property lawyers in Russia

⦿ Registration, protection, and challenging of trademarks
⦿ Protection of copyright, related, and exclusive rights
⦿ Development of license agreements and agreements with authors
⦿ Domain name and patent disputes

By clicking the "Submit" button, you agree to the processing of personal data in accordance with the personal data processing policy

What does a copyright lawyer protect?

Trademarks
Products and design
Computer programs
Audio, photo, and video

Extensive experience in the protection of various intellectual property objects:

Know-how and inventions
Author's texts
Domain names

How can a copyright lawyer help?

Registration of rights

Legal arrangements for the transfer of rights and their registration
Custom work contracts

Employment contracts with authors

License agreements

Transfer of exclusive rights

Registration of software with Rospatent

Registration of trademarks

Depositing with the Russian Authors Society

Judicial protection

Preparation of procedural documents and representation in court hearings
Disputes over  copyrights
 
Disputes over trademarks
 
Disputes over domains
 
Disputes over license agreements
 
Disputes over patents
 
Disputes over franchise agreements
 
Challenging of trademarks

Out-of-court protection

Prompt measures to prevent infringement of intellectual property rights
Claim settlement
 
NDA preparation
 
Trade secret regime
 
Complaints to the FAS
 
Appeals to Roskomnadzor
 
Notifications to search engines
 
Applications in accordance with Article 146 of the RF Criminal Code
Copyright lawyer services
Other services
Other services
Other services
Participation in a court session
60 000
Turnkey case management (general procedure)
from 300 000
Other services
Other services
  • Patent attorney certified in the specialization of inventions and utility models
  • Recognized by Kommersant Publishing House as one of the best lawyers in intellectual property protection in 2025
  • Head of Intellectual Property Protection Practice
By clicking the "Submit" button, you agree to the processing of personal data in accordance with the personal data processing policy
Cases of our copyright lawyers
We achieved the transfer of a wristwatch brand to our client
Gaungzhou Junxiang Trading Co., a manufacturer of wristwatches, contacted us due to the fact that an unscrupulous individual entrepreneur who bought goods and imported them into the gray market registered their Poedagar brand in the Russian Federation without their consent. After that, such a copyright holder began to block the product cards of other distributors of original products on marketplaces and monopolized the market. At first, Rospatent refused to cancel the brand, referring to the lack of a written contract and direct purchases of goods at the factory. We persuaded the client to go to the intellectual property court; as a result, the defendant admitted the infringement and voluntarily transferred the trademark to our clien
Voluntary transfer of a trademark
We won a dispute about the authorship of a vaccine with Nacimbio Group
The research and production complex of FORT LLC, which is part of the Nacimbio group of companies, filed a lawsuit to challenge the authorship of the patent for the employee's invention "Method of obtaining/ manufacturing a vaccine" used for the production of the UltrixQuadri anti-influenza vaccine (more than 40 million doses were produced). The plaintiff engaged a well-known law firm to represent its interests in the Intellectual Property Court. However, we managed to defend the authorship, which will allow the client to receive an annual reward in the form of a percentage of the proceeds from the sale of the vaccine
Annual payments for an employee's invention
We recovered over RUB 4,000,000 for copying a toy
A blogger, owner of an online store of bloptop soft toys (over 400 thousand toys sold), and the author of the famous toy based on the Internet meme "Floppa - a big Russian cat" with an image of a cat from the popular meme "big floppa" applied for protection of his rights to the toy design. The complexity of the dispute is due to the fact that the obvious bad faith of the violator (in the form of replacing the photo), in the opinion of ordinary people, allowed him to defend himself from the claim ("Are you protecting the meme?" - "You are not the author", "Are you protecting the photo?" - "But the photo is different", "Are you protecting the form?" - "It is used by many manufacturers"). We managed to convince the court that the production of a very similar work with the same positioning, when consumers confuse the original and the copy, when the copy could not have been created without the original, could be considered reworking
Compensation of RUB 4,000,000
We recovered RUB 1,320,000 from the NTV channel
We helped a blogger to recover compensation in the amount of RUB 1,320,000 from the NTV television company in the Arbitration Court of Moscow for the violation of copyright and exclusive rights to videos by broadcasting and posting on the website. It was particularly difficult to prove the content of the TV program on the air, since the defendant deleted the recordings in order to avoid liability. We have done a lot of work to collect evidence, and we have managed to build a system of circumstantial evidence that allowed us to confirm the position of our client
Compensation of RUB 1,320,000
We defended against a claim for RUB 5,200,000 for the rights to Zhdun
Si Di Land Contact LLC, engaged in professional activities to protect the rights to the Zhdun copyright item, in order to increase the amount of compensation, filed a claim against our client in the form of doubled cost of the right to use (such compensation is possible only in extraordinary cases). In the first instance, we reduced the amount of compensation to RUB 50,000; in the second instance, under the weight of our arguments, the plaintiff was forced to abandon the claims completely
Savings of RUB 5,200,000
We protected patents and stopped infringement of rights to façade panels
Our client's competitor violated the rights to several utility models. Initially, a claim was sent to the client, and a test purchase was made. In the process of considering the case, the competitor filed objections against the granting of legal protection to the Chamber for Patent Disputes under Rospatent. We managed to defend our patents, as well as force the competitor to conclude an amicable agreement on the terms of recognition of the violation and payment of compensation in the amount of more than RUB 500,000
Patent protection and payment of compensation of RUB 500,000
We recovered RUB 4,681,211 of the inventor's remuneration
The client is one of the four inventors of the UltrixQuadri vaccine, the first Russian inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine that meets all WHO recommendations on the composition and amount of hemagglutinin of each strain of the influenza virus. Full dispute management on a turnkey basis, from drawing up a claim and a statement of claim to participation in court hearings and the execution of the court decision in the court of three instances (first, appeal, cassation). The author's remuneration for the development and each year of use of the invention was collected
Compensation of RUB 4,681,211
We fought off a lawsuit for infringement of rights to the Tenevoy trademark
The manufacturer of "Galving" profiles registered Tenevoy trademark and filed a lawsuit against a number of competitors to recover compensation for illegal, in their opinion, placement on the websites of products with the names "shadow (tenevoy) profile", "shadow (tenevoy) rail", etc. We managed to prove in the courts of first instance and appeal that there was no infringement of trademark rights in the phrases used, since the word "shadow (tenevoy)" is used in the commonly used meaning. We were the first to win the Tenevoy trademark case, laying down a negative practice for the copyright holder, and competitors successfully followed our example
Benefit of RUB 1,000,000
We defended a group of online stores from LEOMAX lawsuits
The well-known TV store LEOMAX notarized the fact of posting videos on the websites of a number of competing online stores and then filed claims with the Moscow Arbitration Court for the recovery of 390 thousand rubles from each store as compensation for copyright infringement. We reviewed the case materials, found a number of contradictions, and, based on them, developed a defense strategy that allowed the defendants to win all cases with our participation
Total saving of RUB 1,170,000
We won a court case with a Moscow Region TV channel
Our client, a YouTube blogger, recovered compensation from the Podolsk TV channel in the amount of 850 thousand rubles for violating his copyright to two videos. We managed to prove in court the gross nature of the violation due to the removal of the channel individualization mark, as well as the audio sequence of the original video. The defendant's reference to the informational nature of the materials was not perceived by the court, since the website containing the violation advertised paid services of the TV channel
Compensation of RUB 850,000
We recovered a compensation of RUB 365,000 for an author of a video
The infringer of the exclusive rights to the works ignored the claims and sought to delay the recovery period as much as possible, in connection with which we sent a claim and filed a lawsuit with the Arbitration Court. Due to the established judicial practice in favor of our client, we managed to persuade the defendant, a large contractor for sanitary work, to conclude an amicable agreement before the first court hearing, under the terms of which the violator pleaded guilty and paid RUB 365,000. The client is completely satisfied with the result and the speed of receiving compensation
Compensation of RUB 365,000
We defended the franchise of Bookingcat pet hotels
Bookingcat company has entered into a number of franchise agreements, but in the agreement instead of "commercial designation" there was indicated a "trade name", which, if formally interpreted by law, cannot be the subject of a transaction. Unscrupulous franchisees filed lawsuits to invalidate the contracts and return lump-sum fees. We managed to prove that the parties agreed on all its essential terms when entering into the franchise agreement, and the repudiation of the concluded agreement is unacceptable
Savings of RUB 400,000
We recovered compensation from MIC Izvestia
Our client's videos were illegally used by Izvestia on its website and in social media groups. The violation was recorded, but the defendant's lawyers delayed the trial: they tried to transfer the case to another court, disputed the ownership of social media groups, and disputed the copyright to the video. Despite RUB all the tricks, we managed to achieve an unconditional victory and a large compensation in the amount of RUB 520,000
Compensation of RUB 520,000
We recovered debt from the developer of an IT system
Under the assignment agreement, the client purchased the debt of STC Izmeritel LLC to Exabyte LLC for the development of parts of the information system for the Department of Information Technologies of St. Petersburg. The problem was that STC Izmeritel LLC included payment conditions in the subcontract only after settlements with the state customer, who, having identified shortcomings in the IS, refused the contract in its entirety. The Supreme Court recognized the imposition of payments under the condition of events beyond the control of the parties as permissible. However, we managed to prove that the reasons for the refusal of the state customer to accept the work performed by STC Izmeritel LLC are not related to the work of Exabyte LLC but to the work of other subcontractors
Debt of RUB 4,950,000
We defended the rights of a professor in a dispute with a student
A graduate of a well-known Moscow university, who decided to "annoy" his former research advisor, filed a lawsuit in the Gagarinsky District Court of Moscow. The grounds were impeccable: the literal coincidence of fragments of the monograph with the articles previously published by the student. The problem was that the professor dictated his thoughts to the student without caring about the registration of his copyright. We managed to challenge the plaintiff's arguments with the help of correctly posed questions to the experts, the answers to which were established an insignificant volume of fragments in the monograph, as well as their derivative nature of the text of regulatory legal acts. The claim was dismissed in full
Total savings of more than RUB 7,000,000
Cancellation of the decision on the "Khoroshee mesto" trademark
During the New Year holidays, the owner of the Moscow café chain "Khoroshee mesto" applied. The client had previously cooperated with a lawyer who registered the trademark, but at the first appeal to the court with a claim against a competitor from St. Petersburg using the sign and domain "Khoroshee mesto", a refusal was received due to the fact that the designations were used in different cities and did not have graphic similarity in the font. The appeal period expired on the first business day. We studied the materials as quickly as possible, prepared, and filed a complaint. The Court of Appeal overturned the decisions of the court of first instance, agreeing with the arguments about the sound and semantic similarity, as well as the inadmissibility of regional protection of designations
Ban on the use of signage and domain
Establishing the fact of plagiarism at a university
An associate professor of the Department of Commodity Science and Examination of Goods, holding a PhD in Technical Sciences, has published a number of monographs widely used in teaching students category management. We were approached by the author of the works from which borrowings were made. By appealing to the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, we managed to achieve the recognition of the circulation as counterfeit and the imposition on the publishing house, as well as the violator, of the obligation to withdraw all copies from sale. Subsequently, we stopped the distribution of works on LitRes, as well as concluded agreements on the peaceful settlement of other violations of copyright and exclusive rights
Recognition of a book as a counterfeit work

Our team of copyright lawyers

Our clients are authors and copyright holders

We act as experts in the media

Reviews

Legal advice on copyright and intellectual property
We can analyze the situation in detail and provide recommendations for resolving the issue
By clicking the "Submit" button, you agree to the processing of personal data in accordance with the personal data processing policy
Address: Moscow, Vorontsovskaya St., 35B, bldg. 1, floor 3 (Taganskaya metro station)
© 2018 — 2025 All rights reserved


Working hours: Mon. - Fri. 9.00 - 18.00
Afonin, Bozhor and Partners LLC
OGRN 1187746441255
INN/KPP 7707413213/770901001
Personal data processing policy
Offer Agreement for the Provision of Legal Services
The website: https://abp.legal/ uses recommendation technologies (for example, Yandex Metrica), based on the use of cookies and similar technologies to maintain statistics of visits, determine the level of interest.
By clicking the "OK" button, you consent to the processing of information using recommendation technologies in accordance with the personal data processing policy and the rules for the use of recommendation technologies
OK